Weather Alert: Winter Storm Warning expires at 10:00 PM on 2/14, issued at 2:54 AM Alton, UT | Antimony, UT | Beaver, UT | Bicknell, UT

Could the Supreme Court make polygamy legal?


Story Comments Share
Updated: 7/11/2008 7:09 pm | Published: 7/11/2008 5:09 pm
Reported by: Chris Vanocur
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) - Is the U.S. Supreme Court about to rule polygamy a protected religious practice? One of Utah's top attorneys is now predicting the justices will do exactly that.

Brian Barnard has not only defended polygamists in the past, later this year he will even appear before the U.S. Supreme Court on another matter.

And Barnard says the legalization of polygamy may not be that far away.

Barnard says, "If consenting adults want to practice polygamy based upon their religious beliefs, I think the Constitution and ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court will uphold that right."

But Barnard also believes what it will take a special type of case to get to the highest court in the land. “One of the things that's going to be necessary in order to get that issue resolved is a clean case, if you will. Not a case where there's also welfare fraud or statutory rape or anything else involved," sys Barnard. 

Barnard feels someone who is prosecuted just for polygamy would have a good chance of eventually winning in court. 

"Two thousand, three thousand years ago, people practiced polygamy for religious reasons and were authorized to do so based upon their religious beliefs," says Barnard.

However, Barnard feels some Utah prosecutors, including Mark Shurtleff, are reluctant to prosecute polygamy because they know a legal ban on polygamy might then be found unconstitutional. 

"Mark Shurtleff has the right to prosecute those people but chooses not to," says Barnard. 

Previously, Shurtleff has talked about the difficulty of prosecuting polygamists, if nothing else because of the sheer numbers involved.

The entire interview with Brian Barnard can be seen on this Sunday morning’s "On the Record" at 9:30 a.m.
Story Comments Share
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

familymom - 9/29/2010 5:46 PM
What should be considered ultimately is that these are consenting adults, practicing family values. Everyone has a right to this. nobody is practicing satanic practice and voodoo. Lets consider how many monogamous relationships have domestic abuse and unhappy and unfaithful spouses. Our society is supposed to be open minded as to different relationships ie gay marriage. What is really so awful about a man and some women having a family and loving each other and staying faithful to themselves? Think about it, do you not want happiness? Why deny anyone of happiness? That should not have to go to the supreme court. I want happiness and success in my life and if this is how they want happiness and success well please do it. If monogamy or celebacy is your answer then please do it.

hohatch - 3/6/2009 6:37 AM
Something that ought to be allowed and should have been through the years, in spite of US v. Reynolds.

joshdobbins - 8/14/2008 10:47 AM
Yes, anti-polygamy laws probably are unconstitutional because the constitution protects the freedom of religous worship. However, the supreme court ruled in the 1886 that the government has the right to restrict the "practices" of religion that are harmful and destructive. If it were not so, then satanic cults could offer human sacrifices under the guise of freedom of religion. I hope and expect that if anti-polygamy laws are ever overruled, that the "practice" will be heavily regulated in order to protect women and children from the disgusting perverts who have corrupted this ancient god-given practice. In fact, I believe that the government would be in a much better position to protect the innocent women and children if anti-polygamy rules were overruled and strict monitoring and enforcement regulations were instituted to ensure that women are not married against their will and that welfare benefits are not abused. It is more likely that the number of polygamists would decrease if it were legal, because you will find very few men who actually want to have more than one wife and dozens of children if he will be held accountable and required to support them and not simply follow after the lusts of the flesh. The funny thing about rats and roaches is that they scatter when you turn on the light.

Shelama - 7/12/2008 9:07 AM
The Supreme Court could and should rule in favor of polygamy. And then the LDS Church can rescind the totally political and expedient Manifesto and get back to living the scriptural New and Everlasting Covenant, D&C 132, in its entirety. Happy Days are here again.
35°
High: 36° | Low: 35°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.