Weather Alert: Winter Storm Warning expires at 10:00 PM on 2/14, issued at 2:54 AM Alton, UT | Antimony, UT | Beaver, UT | Bicknell, UT

Anniversary of LDS polygamy doctrine arrives


Story Comments Share
Updated: 7/12/2008 10:00 pm | Published: 7/10/2008 4:23 pm
Reported by: Chris Vanocur
(lds.org)
(lds.org)
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) - Saturday marks an important LDS anniversary, but the Church is not calling attention to it. 

On July 12th, 1843, Joseph Smith dictated the revelation which would become an important part of the Doctrine and Covenants.
  
Section 132 deals with plural marriage.

And as we near this 165th anniversary, one thing is clear: it remains a defining moment in LDS Church history.

Section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants reads in part:

“I reveal unto you a new and an everlasting covenant: and if ye abide not that covenant, then are ye damned; for no one can reject this covenant and be permitted to enter into my glory."

ABC 4 News asked Utah journalist and historian Verdoia, “When I say the date July 12th, 1843 to you, what do you think of?"
  
Ken Verdoia responded, "The curtain goes up on one of the great American dramas."
  
Ken Verdoia speaks so eloquently about polygamy, he was featured prominently in the PBS series, "The Mormons."

And this revelation, Verdoia says, changed not only thousands of lives but also the future history of the LDS Church.

Verdoia: "It leads to mob action against the church, being driven off from their settlements and their temples, a westward exodus, the murder of their founding prophet…these all stem from the July 12th, 1843 revelation."

And even though the 1890 Manifesto would end the LDS Church's practice of polygamy, Church leaders, from time to time, still denounce it.

LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley said in 1998: “More than a century ago, God clearly revealed unto his Prophet, Wilford Woodruff, that the practice of plural marriage should be discontinued, which means that it is now against the law of God."

Which led ABC 4 to ask Verdoia this question:

"Do you think the Church would like this revelation back?"
  
Verdoia said, "Oh, absolutely not."

Verdoia suggests that, even though polygamy has presented the LDS Church with certain obstacles and challenges, it is important to remember this 165th anniversary.

Verdoia added, “This is a defining principle of the Latter-Day Saint experience and they would not walk away from it because they view it as a revelation from God."

Verdoia also says that every decade or so, like we just saw in Texas, the polygamy issue is again in the national news.

And that prompts the LDS Church to remind people that, 165 years later, plural marriage is no longer one of its beliefs or practices.

The LDS Church politely declined ABC 4's request for a comment on this story.
Story Comments Share
5 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

gypsyjune - 9/21/2008 5:38 PM
If you don't think Joseph Smith practiced polygamy you need to check Family Search to see how many wives are recorded. BTW, make note of how many were teenagers as young as 15 and the wives he had that were married to other men when he married them.

jsdefender - 7/11/2008 5:05 PM
There is a completely different position on this subject that is supported by a substantial amount of historical data. The position is that Joseph Smith, Jr. did not introduce polygamy to the Latter Day Saint Church. He did not teach nor practice polygamy. In fact, he fought against it! Polygamy was not a doctrine of the church established by Joseph Smith, Jr. Polygamy was secretly introduced into the Latter Day Saint Church by men closest to Joseph, including Brigham Young, and attached to his name to make the practice acceptable to church members. The Utah LDS Church purports that Joseph Smith, Jr., received a revelation (Utah LDS Doctrine and Covenants, Section 132) from God commanding the practice of celestial marriage (also known as spiritual wifery or polygamy). However, this "revelation" was not written by him, but by others wishing to give credibility to the practice of polygamy by attaching Joseph's name as author. While the Utah LDS Church teaches the "revelation" was written in 1843, they can produce no credible evidence to support this position. (Read the decision rendered March 16, 1894, by Judge Philips in the Temple Lot Case at http://restorationbookstore.org/articles/heritage/articles/churchincourt.htm#start.) In addition, the Utah LDS Church first made this "revelation" public in 1852, 8 years after Joseph's death, which made it impossible for him to deny its truth and, thus, places a great amount of doubt on the validity of that document. It was publicly presented by Orson Pratt in 1852 in Utah at the request of Brigham Young in order to give public sanction to the practice of polygamy, which had been practiced in the Utah LDS church for several years. For a better understanding of Joseph's stand against polygamy, read Joseph Smith Fought Polygamy at http://restorationbookstore.org/jsfp-index.htm, which provides over two volumes of documentation supporting his innocence.

jtsorensen - 7/11/2008 12:32 PM

leSavaii - 7/11/2008 11:12 AM
If the Church is not paying attention to the issue, then why still digging it up? Perhaps the media has nothing else to talk & report about. The Church has reasons, especially the awake of the polygamist sect in Texas during this unigue polical election year in the USA. Whats amazing is that Ken ignored the fact, the main driving force behind the mainstream christians at the time of the Church early persecutions was not polygamy. But the christian extremists didn't like the idea of God the Father along with His Son Jesus Christ appeared to a 14 year old boy (Joseph Smith), and then followed Moroni with the gold plates. There has been alot of Monday nite quarterbacking lately about this matter. When our leaders 165 years ago said STOP, the faithful listened & obeyed ever since...and for those who didn't well, we all know who they are & where they are.

rachela - 7/10/2008 10:42 PM
The new and everlasting covenent of marriage discussed in Section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenents is eternal marriage which includes, but does not require, some cases of plural marriage. Sorry this is more boring then the version expert Ken Verdoga shares, but for those of us who do not just talk the talk but walk the walk that is the truth.
35°
High: 36° | Low: 35°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.