Homeland Security memo on right-wing extremists concerns Utah veterans


Story Comments Share
Updated: 4/16/2009 12:02 pm | Published: 4/15/2009 2:33 pm
AK-47 rifle (ABC 4 News)
AK-47 rifle (ABC 4 News)
"It concerns me that Homeland Security would make such a broad statement about vets." Dennis Howland, Junior Vice Commander, Veterans of Foreign Wars – Utah

SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) - A recently published government memo warning police agencies about recruiting by so called "rightwing" extremist groups is raising concern among Utah veterans.

The memo, titled "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" was released to police agencies across the country to warn against what the Department of Homeland Security believes may be an increased threat of domestic terrorism.

The DHS memo says that the election of Barack Obama, coupled with recent economic troubles and members of the military returning from wars in Afghanistan and Iraq might lead extremist groups to recruit more veterans with combat experience. According to the memo, the election of the first African-american president in U.S. history has influenced more white supremacist groups to increase recruiting efforts.

The memo says domestic terrorism during the 1990s involving former military members aligning themselves with extremist groups is similar to present-day issues. The report also says that the economic downturn was a factor in two of the more publicized violent events of the early 1990s, most notably the clash at Ruby Ridge with Randy Weaver and his family and the bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City.

Some say the memo unfairly profiles veterans as vulnerable to such recruiting, including Utah Veterans of Foreign Wars spokesman Dennis Howland.

"Anyone who thinks our veterans are vulnerable to such recruiting has lost faith in our young men and women," said Howland.

The "Extremism" memo isn't law, but House Republican leader John Boehner says the report unfairly characterizes military veterans as rightwing extremists.

Howland agreed. 

"It concerns me that Homeland Security would make such a broad statement about vets," said Howland. "Veterans are less potential extremists because they've seen how bad things can get."

Howland added that people who are susceptible to join such groups might have a natural predisposition to join without military or war experience.

What does the memo mean to local law enforcement?

ABC 4 contacted Salt Lake Police Chief Chris Burbank, and he said the report is something he and others take under advisement, but plainly stated, "We don't profile."

Burbank says he and other agencies are glad to work with Homeland Security, but they won't be looking for veterans as potential extremists.

"We look at criminal acts, and not veterans," said Burbank. "If someone were to become a threat, we would investigate that as a local law enforcement issue before it becomes a federal one."

Burbank added that if anyone were concerned that police officers might look at veterans as potential domestic terrorists to remember that many officers are veterans themselves.

Utah VFW Statement on 'Extremism' Memo

We seem to go through these radical phases every time there is a major change in policy or deviation from routine. People have a difficult time adjusting to change and they often pass on their frustrations with over emphasizing controversy.


We experienced it when we came home from Vietnam. There was a general feeling that those against the war - particularly those who had experienced combat would disappear in the mountains and parks and resurface as some sort of anti-American activist.


I supposed some did but I never believed that any of our men or women who served then and serve today were that emotionally weak to be automatically drawn into those groups, whether they were disgruntled or not.


Our veterans today are no different. If they were recruited, it would be a fraction of a fraction of one percent. Anyone who believes our young men and women serving in combat today are an easy mark for radical recruitment have obviously lost confidence in them.


Most of those serving our military today find such radical groups and their philosophy repulsive and appalling at the least. The majority are too bright and are a quite bit more defensive about their commitment to a less than perfect nation.


The majority are dedicated to protecting the constitution and our freedoms against anyone bent on destroying it from without or from within. Perhaps many of these activist groups over rate their own ability to recruit our veteran men and women into their narrow vision.


I believe if they are recruited there certainly won’t be a staggering increase in numbers from the ranks of veterans. Those who do join these radical or anti-America groups are a type that would have been easily swayed whether they served in combat areas or whether they served in the military or not. Some folks have a natural need to belong - and veteran or not they join these groups to fulfill this need.


I can’t argue the opinions or the cautions issued by Homeland Security. They have resources that allow them to assess threats and issue the necessary warnings to the public. That is their job. And they do it well.


But issuing broad statements on assessments on possibilities toward veterans is discrediting the strong will and dedication of our fine men and women who serve our military. It is totally off-base. It just don’t compute.


I would hope Homeland Security would tone down this assessment and give more credit toward those who serve this great nation. World-wide, there are none better.


Disgruntled? They have earned the right? Anti-American or mad enough to become a security threat – I don’t believe it. I would stake my freedom that Homeland Security may be a bit over-estimating on this one.


-Dennis Howland


Junior Vice Commander Veterans of Foreign Wars – Utah



Story Comments Share
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

giark1970 - 4/16/2009 7:50 PM
Can you hear the hob-nails in their jack-boots clicking off the pavement yet? I submit that it is an individuals not only right but duty to constantly question authority. When the government says they are going to do one thing, but does another, without any kind of explanation, what right do they have to complain about people saying or doing something about it? I don't mean terrorist acts or the murder of innocent people in cowardly acts. I don't think the government would have the perceived problem with these so-called right wing extremists if they themselves could show that they can be trusted. Trust is earned. The activities of the Federal Government, specifically the executive and legislative branch, have been sub-par to say the least. The lies they tell are amazing to watch. Why is the treasonous document Patriot Act still in effect? Didn't Obama say he was going to rescind that thing? Why are all the jobs out-sourcing to other countries? Doesn't the Federal Government realize that many of the actions they take promote this kind of thinking? I believe that 90% of the people who work with or for the government are good, well meaning people. But don't put out a memo like this without taking responsibility for your part in these behaviors. The Federal Government should take the beam out of it's own eye before trying to remove the mote in the American people's. They need to improve their reputation before they start pointing fingers at veterans.

Just the facts - 4/16/2009 10:27 AM
I am a vet and gun owner and I find it interesting that the government can and does paint with such a wide brush those that do not agree with them. The fact that the second amendment helps grantee he rest of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution also is not lost on them. Why else would the Government want registration except for confiscation? Then to take away the rest of our when they wish. You may say that I do not trust the government but trust must be earned and it can be lost and they both depend on the actions they take.

johnnygard - 4/15/2009 11:31 PM
The article says Randy Weaver was a terrorist. Can someone tell me what terrorism he was involved with? In fact, the crimes he was accused of - nothing to do with terrorism - he was acquitted of, and should have won a lawsuit against the Sniper that killed his wife. Johnnygard

fedup - 4/15/2009 7:41 PM
So what exactly is the point of the Ak47 picture??? So being pro-life, pro-constitution, pro-small govt, pro low taxes, and pro god is extreme??? I thought they were fundamental values of a good and prosperous society. When then I guess I better turn myself in to the SS troops at DHS? ABC and the rest you drive by media types need to get your lips off obamas azz and see him for the socialist he is. Again, nice picture, way to play into the misguided hype... when a thug or a illegal thug breaks down your only then will you realize the cops can only tag your body once you are dead.
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.