Weather Alert: High Wind Warning expires at 10:00 PM on 5/26, issued at 4:19 AM Aneth, UT | Bluff, UT | Bonanza, UT | Cisco, UT

Roy police call death act of self-defense


Story Comments Share
Updated: 12/17/2010 5:50 pm | Published: 12/17/2010 5:46 pm
Reported by: Marcos Ortiz
John Frederick Sharp
John Frederick Sharp
ROY Utah (ABC4 News) – Police said it was an act of self defense that claimed the life of 37-year old John F. Sharp.

Sharp was shot twice after he allegedly forced his way into the home of his ex-girlfriend and began choking her.

Police said Mellony Pursel attempted to fight him off and that’s when her 17-year old niece intervened.

"She gets a gun, fires two shots at the individual (Sharp) who is attacking Mellony and both shots hit him in the chest,” said Roy police Chief Greg Whinham. “Both shots exit through him and strike Mellony.”

According to court documents, Pursel’s life was threatened for 36-hours prior to the shooting.

Pursel told police the harassment started Wednesday.

She filed a complaint Thursday and got a protective order.

In the complaint Pursel wrote about the threats allegedly made by Sharp.

It began Wednesday at 3 a.m. when she claimed Sharp forced his way into the home. She wrote: “(He said) I was a (expletive) and how he will cut my throat. I hope you die.”

He left the home and returned once more at 5 a.m. on Thursday.

She wrote: (He said) I am going to (expletive) kill you. I want you dead.”When she threatened to call police he left. But once more he returned at 9 a.m. Thursday. This time Pursell said he was furious as he broke into the home. She wrote: (He’s) throwing tv’s, bedroom items in the room and kitchen. (He said) You are going to pay for this. I will (expletive) kill you.”

She called police and this time they arrive in time to arrest him following a brief foot chase.

His step-brother was with Sharp Wednesday and noticed he was not himself.

“I tried to calm him down,” said Adams. “He was so pissed off at the world and didn't care about anyone or what he did or who he hurt and he told me I'm going to end up in prison."

Sharp got out of jail late Thursday. He was released to the custody of his parents. But he wouldn’t stay and got into a fight.

"He had gotten into an altercation here at my parents house with a knife,” said his step-brother Danny Adams. (They were) trying to stop him from leaving because he wanted to go up to Mellany's house and I guess kill her.”

Danny Adams immediately called police when he learned he was enroute to Pursel’s home.

When police arrived to the Pursel home, Sharp was already dead.

"Anyway you look at it it's a tragedy," said Chief Whinham.

Pursel's 17 year old niece who is accused of killing Sharp was not arrested. Police said she was acting in self-defense.

As for Sharp’s family they’re blaming themselves.

“I feel bad that I got him out,” said his step-father Lonnie Adams. “I kind of blame myself.”

Story Comments Share
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

missy76 - 3/27/2012 8:28 AM
0 Votes
I believe that this was premeditated.. She went and got the gun a few days before the murder actually took place. As for John, he has never in the 15 years that he and my sister were together off and on... And married for 5 years prior to his death... He never laid a single hand on her. And believe me, they had their problems. He was not a violent man towards women. There is something that is not being said to protect the 17 year old girl that slot my brother! There was something more going on, that's a fact. I think this needs to be investigated further to find out the truth. Just because he had been to jail before does not make him the bad guy. This needs to be looked at further and not just thrown in a drawer and called closed. It is far from closed. That girl was wrong and so was the girlfriend. And they need to be punished for their actions!

grumpyee - 12/31/2010 12:17 PM
0 Votes
It's regrettable that the 17 year old had to use the gun. But never the less a violent man was removed from society when society failed to recognize that anger management would not have helped this man. Even incarceration would have only fueled his anger and his action bordered on the insane. To second guess the motive of the 17 year old when one is not in her shoes, is to guess that the angry man would do not harm. Sorry, but when society failed, the 17 year old did her best.

robertsgunshop - 12/22/2010 8:06 AM
0 Votes
"She filed a complaint Thursday and got a protective order." And we see how well that worked out for her. When are people going to learn that protective orders aren't worth the paper they are written on. Get a gun and get trained. You are your own best defense. The police, for the excellent job they do, are reactive. They usually show up after the fact to take the report and clean up the mess. And the SCOTUS has ruled many times that they have no duty to protect any one individual. Their duty is to the "public at large".

justiceplz - 12/18/2010 6:32 AM
0 Votes
“This article appears to me to be concocted and fails to provide why the shooting was justified. I don’t buy the details provided or the writing style of the of the author. This sounds like parts of the story are fabricated and that the girl being a 17 year old with the impression that she is protecting her baby etc. is the justification. It all sounds too made up. The premise that he took a knife with the intent on killing his girlfriend is defeated by the lack of its use. The justification that the guy was “strangling” his girl friend is defeated by her not being dead, not suffering from broken Hyoid bone or crushed Cricoid or Thyroid cartilage of the throat and that she was awake and alert. Having damage to these structures, often causes swelling to the point of closing off the air supply, an x-ray would establish this. The fact that the girlfriend was hit in the shoulder by a bullet passing through the chest of the person is confusing unless she is very short or the person was not standing when he was shot. Trajectory determination would answer that question. The 17 year old shot him twice in the chest as he “lunged” for her. I have an issue with this as even being plausible based on the shoulder wound of the girlfriend. I know that a person lunging toward you continues the forward motion when shot. In addition unless his spine was severed he could be mobile for up to full minute and would have easily made contact with the 17 year old. Even if one of the rounds destroyed his heart, he would have 60 to 90 seconds to make contact with the 17 year old. I base this on my many years of forensic experience and death investigation. That experience tells me that the article is very wrong or the investigation is very bad. Killing a person is not justified by fear alone. This I think is a case of fear and therefore may not be justified. It would be interesting to see what the investigation actually entailed.” Furthermore the distance he was supposed to have traveled on
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.