Breaking News

Police: Woman offers relative's virginity to man for $10K

Updated: 10/24/2011 1:40 pm | Published: 5/23/2011 5:12 pm

Related Links

Neighbors angry with woman offering sex with teen

SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) - Police say a Salt Lake County woman offered a man sex with a 13 year old relative in exchange for $10,000.

Felicia Rea McClure is charged with two counts of first degree felony aggravated sex abuse of a child and two counts of second degree felony sexual exploitation of a minor.

According to official documents filed by the Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Felicia McClure's boyfriend Richard Glazer saw several text messages on the suspect's cell phone on May 18th. The messages were between the suspect and a man named "Don" arranging the sex for money.

The documents also state that on several occasions, the suspect and her female relative modeled bras and thongs for the prospective customer, and that the suspect took pictures of her relative and sent them to other adult men.

Authorites say the girl agreed to the sex, but later changed her mind.

McClure was arrested and booked into the Salt Lake County Jail. If convicted on the charges against her, McClure could face 15 years to life for each of the two first degree felony charges.

UPDATE 5/24: Neighbors react to McClure arrest

Story Comments

Print Story

8 Comment(s)

Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

chrkyl000 - 5/29/2011 10:33 AM

0 Votes

Report User

News flash aclausing, you missed something no 13 year old could ever AGREE to have sex that is why there are laws out thre to protect kids her age. I am sure she was not thinking what she could do with the money rather thinking what she could do to get out of it and not have to do that. You are one sick twisted individual to ever post what you have about a 13 year old and deserve to be sitting in jail right next to the relative that did this. Take a seat in hell and rest your soul there. No one has a right to out a 13 year old and her right to privacy. She is suppose to be protected by these fine laws we have and the media, though Channel 4 has sbown they care more of there story then they do of this young girls right to privacy. Last I checked to has the right not to have her name out there or the abusers. I can only Pray that this family comes back hard on channel 4 and makes them pay for what harm they have inflicted on this young girl.

aclausing - 5/24/2011 3:47 PM

0 Votes

Report User

News flash.....this story has made national news. Maybe next time when a parent decides to exploit their child or children to pedophile's they'll think twice. So sorry for the 13 year old but it's reported as if she didn't resist at first. She was probably fantasizing about what she could do with some of the money. She is definitely going to need a lot of therapy. I think it's good that "we" have named the mother. She needs to be held accountable.

yooper - 5/24/2011 12:57 PM

0 Votes

Report User

We can read, thank you for your concern. This case was edited after we complained. However, please note that the video still gives the original title of this story.

lola8641 - 5/24/2011 12:43 PM

0 Votes

Report User

People, it says "female relative" of the suspect named. Not child, probably does not have same name as suspect. Do you pay attention to what you read?

plumfunny - 5/24/2011 10:55 AM

2 Votes

Report User

I just called them. They said they will take into consideration removing the mom's name. I am disgusted....If you look online at the SLC Trib they said at the end of the article that they will not release the mother's name in order to protect the child. Way to go SLC Trib-- at least not all the local newsrooms are incompetent....I suggest you all make the same call...it would seem that they need a push.

yooper - 5/24/2011 10:45 AM

2 Votes

Report User

First, no self respecting media outlet would publish the name of a parent accused of sexual abuse of their own child. Second, 13 is never an age of consent, so the "agreed to have sex" comment is irrelevant and also revictimizes that child. Clearly, ABC 4 does not feel like they have done to humiliate a minor who may have had trouble telling her mother (whose entire purpose in life was supposed to protect the child, not profit from) "no". Does ABC 4 have editors anymore?

BURLEE09 - 5/24/2011 7:59 AM

0 Votes

Report User

I agree with the other comment. I can't believe you would put the name of this person out there so that the child can be indentified. Every other news channel had enough respect for this child to not release the mothers name. I think this should be removed.

kjt6789 - 5/23/2011 10:48 PM

1 Vote

Report User

I hope ABC4 will remove the name of the mother from this story!! The daughter has a lot to deal with as it is now, but making it easier to identify the daughter is in bad taste! I noticed the AP and others are not reporting the mother's name so please do the same!!

Click Here to Add Your Comments View All