Conceal Carry Permits could be a thing of the past unless Gov. Herbert vetoes HB 76


Story Comments Share
Updated: 3/16 4:15 pm | Published: 3/14 7:47 pm
Reported by: Kimberly Nelson
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) - Conceal carry permits in Utah may be a thing of the past. House Bill 76, which allows adults to carry unloaded concealed weapons without a permit, passed both the House and the Senate and is headed to the Governor’s desk to await his signature.

It’s a controversial bill, but it passed both houses with a majority vote. Sen. Jim Dabakis voted against the bill and told ABC 4 News he hopes Governor Herbert has the courage to veto it. 

Sen. Dabakis explained, “Anybody who's over 21 can take an assault weapon, can paint their face black, can take full camouflage gear, can take a nap sack of bullets and as long as the chamber isn't full, without any registration and without any background check, and they can get on a UTA bus.”

The idea sits just as well with people we spoke with on the street. 

Darin Porter said, "I'd probably say no I'm against it. I think if people want a gun there's a process in place for them to get passage to get a gun, carry a gun."

Richard Stevens agreed. "I don't think it's a very good idea just for the simple fact that it's going to be on the people themselves to educate themselves about the dangers of carrying around a gun,” said Stevens. 

The bill's supporters say it actually keeps people safer by keeping the guns already on the street unloaded.

Majority House Leader Rep. Brad Dee said, "Let's take for example a pick up truck with a shot gun in the rack, or a hunting rifle in the rack, up until now this point you could have the rifle loaded." 

It's the lack of back ground checks that really make people we spoke with nervous.

Last year alone, the permitting process and the back ground checks that go with it, prevented more than 600 people from carrying a concealed weapon because of things like felony convictions, domestic violence and protective orders.

Rep. Dee argues, "The second amendment doesn't say you have to have a back ground check to keep and bear arms.” 

"That's true it doesn't, but there's nothing in the constitution about having a driver's license either,” said Brandie Llewellyn, a concealed carry permit holder.

Those against HB 78 worry the bill is veto proof. Even if the Governor Herbert vetoes it, they worry there’s enough votes to override his veto, but Sen. John Valentine told ABC 4 News, “There’s always a difference between the numbers who vote for a bill and the numbers who will actually vote veto override.”

Story Comments Share
11 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

Mm491 - 3/19/2013 8:38 PM
0 Votes
Forgive me I meant legal and competent to carry,

Mm491 - 3/19/2013 8:35 PM
0 Votes
I say sign the bill no different than our open carry now, or maybe everyone who is legal and computation should start open carrying and see how much people realy get uncomfortable and cry out. If you chose not exercise your rights fine, don't try and be a dictator and stop me from my rights

gm7410 - 3/15/2013 1:48 PM
2 Votes
It is already legal for unloaded firearms to be carried they just have to be visible. This just allows someone to conceal the unloaded firearm. It won't do away with the concealed carry permit. Under this bill you would still be prohibited from carrying on buses, trains, or within 1000 feet of a school without a concealed carry permit.

taylor123 - 3/15/2013 1:38 PM
0 Votes
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151497418188958&set=a.500761273957.276487.142643573957&type=1&theater¬if_t=like

noely - 3/15/2013 12:49 PM
0 Votes
This is the WORST bill ever! Unloaded means no shell in the chamber but, the gun IS loaded! This state must be crazy over guns....we NEED better background checks & permits ensure that the users DO have a bit of knowledge about handling the weapon. Even underage children have to take gun safety classes before hunting....a PERMIT guarantees that at least they DID get a modicum of training before heading out with their hidden weapon! PLEASE VETO THE BILL!

nrajeff - 3/15/2013 11:51 AM
1 Vote
Did 3915sam just advocate murdering any politician who votes for this law? If so, doesn't that constitute a terroristic threat, which means the poster should be put on the list of people who should be prevented from possessing a firearm? Look at this quote, taken from the last part of his post: "If a purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect us from an evil and murderous tyrannical government, including elected Mormon Republican conspirators and accomplices in the killings of our loved ones, then it is our duty to stop and punish them with our own guns -- including killing them for killing our loved ones." Wow. Should the police be investigating that threat?

3915sam - 3/15/2013 8:39 AM
0 Votes
Utah's overwhelming Mormon/Republican legislature just successfully passed a bill which allows anyone to carry a concealed gun without a background check or permit as long as there is no bullet actually in the chamber, although the person can be otherwise carrying as much ammo as he/she wants. Of course, this is just another example of how Mormon Republican elected officials are complete lackeys for the ever-greedier, thieving, amoral filthy-rich in general, including those filthy-rich in the gun industry whose only goal is to maximize their profits by maximizing sales of guns, gun accessories and ammo without restrictions of any kind regardless of the resulting mass carnage and death. This bill is now awaiting Utah Governor Gary Herbert's signature. We all know he wants to and would have voted for it if he was still in the state legislature. I urge Governor Herbert to now sign this bill into law. Then, when someone's loved one is killed because of this law or the failure to pass and enforce other common sense gun restrictions, that person has the right to individually bring those Mormon Republican elected officials to justice -- since true justice will be prevented in our perverted official judicial system also controlled by Republicans. If a purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect us from an evil and murderous tyrannical government, including elected Mormon Republican conspirators and accomplices in the killings of our loved ones, then it is our duty to stop and punish them with our own guns -- including killing them for killing our loved ones.

ullh82w8 - 3/14/2013 10:32 PM
1 Vote
shalaha-what does one have to do with the other? We already have both medicaid and medicare.

Shalaha - 3/14/2013 10:16 PM
0 Votes
I do not understand how they could pass this and not a medicare for those who need it. All this session did was prove what Utah really cares about. Not the people or their safety.

ullh82w8 - 3/14/2013 9:33 PM
1 Vote
Does this dimwitted Senator realize they can do that now? It will just be against the law? If they plan on breaking those laws, why wouldn't they break all the laws? Oh, cause that is the MAGIC ONE! It's just the law abiding citizens won't be allowed to protect themselves with their LEGALLY concealed weapons.
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.