Weather Alert: High Wind Warning expires at 10:00 PM on 5/26, issued at 4:19 AM Aneth, UT | Bluff, UT | Bonanza, UT | Cisco, UT

ABC 4 Exclusive: Utah going nuclear?


Story Comments Share
Updated: 11/19/2010 9:50 pm | Published: 11/18/2010 11:27 pm
Reported by: Noah Bond
Nuclear Plants
Nuclear Plants
GREEN RIVER, Utah (ABC 4 News) - Utah is on its way to going nuclear. Plans to build a nuclear power plant are quickly moving forward on the outskirts of Green River in Emery County.  The plant would stand about 180 miles southeast of Salt Lake City.

The chances of building a plant in Utah are very high, says Blue Castle Holdings CEO Aaron Tilton.  His company is spending $100 million to get permission to build.

Emery County is Utah's number one energy producer delivering 82 percent of the State's needs north to Salt Lake City and south to St. George, but the current energy producers are almost maxed out.

"Nuclear power is consistent with the lowest cost producer of electricity in the U.S. on average," said Tilton.  He says his proposed nuclear plant would be powerful enough to provide 50 percent of Utah's energy needs today.  "On a scale of 1 to 10 we think it's a 9 or 10 that it's going be built," he said.

The plant would stand four miles west of the small community known as Green River.  The plan is to build two 1,500 megawatt units.

ABC 4's Noah Bond talked with locals in Green River.  He learned there is overwhelming support for the plant.  "We've got families that have learned to live on basically nothing," said Green River Businessman and Church Leader Kelly Bayless.  He says his boarded up Community of about 1,000 people needs an economic recovery.

"We're looking about $4 billion worth of tax revenues from the State of Utah," said Emery County Economic Development Director Mike McCandless.

The $4 billion would be generated during the first 20 years of the nuclear plants life and continue until the plant closes down anywhere from 60 to 100 years after opening.  "That means schools that means fire stations," said McCandless.

Building the plant would bring 4,000 construction jobs and later 1,200 permanent jobs with an average salary of $80,000 to the region, but the Executive Director for Heal Utah has major concerns.  "There's not enough water here in Utah and this is not the best way to use it," said Vanessa Pierce.

She filed a motion to stop the nuclear plant from getting water rights.  The plant would use 53,000 acre-feet of water a year dropping the Green River by up to one and a half inches. "With the studies already done on the River we already determined it would not unreasonably affect the environment of the stream," said Tilton.

The answer to whether Utah goes nuclear can be found in the Green River.  Colorado River Conservation District Manager Eric Kuhn says there is plenty of water for the nuclear plant in Utah and it would not have a very big impact on the environment.  Kuhn also says Utah is not using all of its water rights and there is enough for this plant to operate.

Utah's State Engineer is expected to decide whether to grant Blue Castle Holdings water rights for the nuclear plant by January of 2011.





Story Comments Share
6 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

scibbat - 1/4/2011 9:37 PM
0 Votes
Talk is cheap. If anyone can find a better, cheaper, cleaner use for the water needed to provide cost efficient power, Bring it on.. If producing power is not profitable, who will do it ? We can't just tack another bill on the taxpayers like solar or wind programs have already done

John Farmer - 11/20/2010 5:27 PM
0 Votes
Susan Griffin, I do not know where you are getting your information but you are poorly misinformed about nuclear power. First a nuclear power plant is not a nuclear bomb. There is no correlation between down winders and nuclear power. Nuclear power is a contained power source unlike the above ground testing or the coal production which has free release more nuclear isotopes than the entire history of commercial western nuclear reactors. Susan it seems that all you are trying to do is create fear. The fact is there has never been a death due to an acute radiation dose in the entire history of commercial western nuclear facilities. In fact according to US Labor Department it is as safe to work in a nuclear power plant as it is to work in office cubicle. Susan you should really look up on the web the theory of radiation hormesis. Try using these key words Dr Luckey radiation hormesis. This will go a long way to explaining why nuclear workers live longer than the general public. In regards to the fact that you bring up about the cost of nuclear power plants you are way of the mark. Today’s fleet of nuclear power plants runs at the same cost of 40 year old plus hydro power which is the cheapest power source on the market. New nuclear power plants will have an operational life of 100 years. Since it only cost a fraction of the amount of money to run and fuel a nuclear power plant as it will take to build a new nuclear power plant it is only a mater of time before the Green River plant is profitable. Viva the Nuclear Renaissance, Jfarmer9

susangriffin - 11/20/2010 12:12 PM
0 Votes
Hasn't Utah, downwind of nuclear testing , suffered enough! Read Refuge by Terry Tempest Williams about the cancer that struck so many in her family caused by radiation poisoning. It's time we figured in the cost of the wide range of illnesses caused by toxic radiation, which in fact lowers immunity to every disease you can think of and throws bodily systems into dysfunction, while lowering the IQ scores of developing children. And the cost to the environment is incalculable. Will the Green River survive the waste that inevitably leaks into the ground water around plants? If you are going to talk about chances, how about revealing the chances of radiation toxicity poisoning the people, land, water, domesticated and wild animals of Utah? Given extensive experience, those chances are also about 9 to 10 out of 10. And look again at history-- one of the other reasons people all over the country have voted out or gotten rid of or rejected nuclear power is that has never turned a profit anywhere. In fact, it's only created huge deficits. Not surprising when tons of raw material, mined at a huge human cost to health, and tons of water and other resource and sources of energy (including electricity) are used simply to boil water! How about using wind power and sun power--internationally recognized as the energy source for the future and in which America is sadly falling way behind--breaking a long and distinguished record of being first in new technologies. This healthy technology will create more jobs more quickly and these jobs will not endanger the lives of those who are employed and the lives of their children (through genes damaged from radiation)

susangriffin - 11/20/2010 12:03 PM
0 Votes
Hasn't Utah, downwind of nuclear testing , suffered enough! Read Refuge by Terry Tempest Williams about the cancer that struck so many in her family caused by radiation poisoning. It's time we figured in the cost of the wide range of illnesses caused by toxic radiation, which in fact lowers immunity to every disease you can think of and throws bodily systems into dysfunction, while lowering the IQ scores of developing children. And the cost to the environment is incalculable. Will the Green River survive the waste that inevitably leaks into the ground water around plants? If you are going to talk about chances, how about revealing the chances of radiation toxicity poisoning the people, land, water, domesticated and wild animals of Utah? Given extensive experience, those chances are also about 9 to 10 out of 10. And look again at history-- one of the other reasons people all over the country have voted out or gotten rid of or rejected nuclear power is that has never turned a profit anywhere. In fact, it's only created huge deficits. Not surprising when tons of raw material, mined at a huge human cost to health, and tons of water and other resource and sources of energy (including electricity) are used simply to boil water! How about using wind power and sun power--internationally recognized as the energy source for the future and in which America is sadly falling way behind--breaking a long and distinguished record of being first in new technologies. This healthy technology will create more jobs more quickly and these jobs will not endanger the lives of those who are employed and the lives of their children (through genes damaged from radiation)

JWW57 - 11/19/2010 1:27 PM
0 Votes
If you want to live in the stone age then you should do everything in your power to block the building of this plant. If you want to make the air less clean by adding more coal fired power plants, then you should do everything you can to block this plant. It's up to you, the people of Utah.

John Farmer - 11/19/2010 6:53 AM
0 Votes
In regards to the Green River we in Utah can use this water to produce carbon free environmentally friendly nuclear power or we can give up or right to use this water letting Nevada take over our water rights. Regardless this water will be used. Jfarmer9
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.