Court overturns UHP cross decision


Story Comments Share
Updated: 8/18/2010 7:49 pm | Published: 8/18/2010 12:22 pm
Written by: Dan Metcalf Jr.
Contributor: Chris Vanocur
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) - The U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver has unanimously overturned a decision that allowed the display of roadside crosses in honor of Utah Highway Patrol troopers who have fallen in the line of duty.

The 10th Circuit Court also ordered Judge David Sam to order the crosses removed.

Sam ruled in favor of the UHP crosses in November of 2007, saying the crosses did not represent a religious symbol, but a proper memorial and a symbol of death.

The lawsuit was originally brought five years by local and national atheists.

Wednesday, their attorney, Brian Barnard, told ABC 4 that the crosses,

"...violate the First Amendment. They're an improper mixing of Church and State. They're an endorsement of religion by the state and they are unconstitutional."

The justices ruled that the cross, while considered a symbol of death, also conveys an even deeper religious message.

Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff was both surprised and disappointed with this new ruling,

"They're memorials and people understand that a cross on the side of the road means death. It's not - oh, someone is celebrating Christianity."

The crosses were constructed and erected with the use of donated funds, but stand on public land.

The court ruled on Wednesday that a "reasonable person" would see the crosses as a religious symbol, and ruled in favor of the atheists.

The case is now all but guaranteed to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

General Shurtleff also tells ABC 4 he would personally like to handle it before the nation's highest court.

Because the case is likely to be appealed, the UHP crosses will probably stay in place for the foreseeable future.


Story Comments Share
6 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

prayingmom1960 - 8/19/2010 6:17 PM
I know! WE could get after them for imposing their beliefs on us and for filing these lawsuits,taking court time and costing tax payers money!

prayingmom1960 - 8/19/2010 6:15 PM
Christians: The end is coming soon! It breaks my heart that lawsuits like this are being brought. I wonder if there is something we could sue the non-believers for.

roz2010 - 8/19/2010 7:42 AM
We live in a country that 95% has a religious belief system, why is it that the 5% that don't believe get their way? Why is it that we en- mass storm the courts as Religious Believers are called fanatics? But the courts cater to these non believers so easily? This country was built on a religious belief and freedom from the oppressors in other countries, Go back to them! We are the majority here, and we believe these crosses should stay, a symbol of a beloved person that died in the line of duty and we hope his soul is in heaven. You who think that this should be removed, you too, have a soul, even if you don't want to believe it, on your death bed, because you will die some day, where do you think you would want your soul to go? Oh, because there is a place called Hades-Hell. You will some day die, and your flesh will be either cremated or you will be eaten by worms, but your soul, yes, your soul will be delivered to either Heaven or Hell. Think about it, what if all those religious fanatics are right? What if...?

monkeysuncle - 8/18/2010 5:40 PM
The idea that the Latin cross is NOT a religious symbol stands reason on its head. Those promulgating such ideas are either dishonest or ignorant. I'd like to be present when such a person suggests to someone like Pat Robertson, Billy Graham or the Pope that the cross is not a symbol of the Christian religion and faith, but is instead just a big letter "t". Good luck with that.

BuBBaBead - 8/18/2010 4:18 PM
Instead of Feds determining these things, there needs to be a national vote. I am in no way religious, but to me these crosses are not religious icons, but a way for us to remember those who gave it all for us. The fact that this is even an issue in our court systems is underpants on head tarted.

Utah fan - 8/18/2010 3:07 PM
Wow. I have a feeling this will be appealed to the Supreme Court. Personally, I don't see the problem with the crosses and agree with the first decision that they are not being used as religious symbols but as memorials to the men & women who died in the line of duty. What is next? Do we need to go through Arlington and remove all of the crosses there too?
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.