Weather Alert: Winter Storm Warning expires at 10:00 PM on 2/14, issued at 2:54 AM Alton, UT | Antimony, UT | Beaver, UT | Bicknell, UT

Angry Woods Cross residents confront mayor and refinery president


Story Comments Share
Updated: 11/16/2009 5:05 pm | Published: 11/04/2009 8:50 pm
Silver Eagle Refinery fire and explosion (Aaron Kimbell, ABC 4 News)
Silver Eagle Refinery fire and explosion (Aaron Kimbell, ABC 4 News)
WOODS CROSS, Utah (ABC 4 News) - Hundreds of angry residents confronted the mayor of Woods Cross and the president of Silver Eagle refinery Wednesday after a refinery explosion damaged many homes.

Fire officials say the explosion was a result of a line carrying hydrogen and diesel fuel that leaked onto the ground. What was supposed to be a meeting there Thursday night held by the refinery to make sure everyone was covered, almost ended up in a brawl.

One neighbor said they feel they've been living "down the barrel of a gun" and didn't even know it.

“You were warned that the blast zone would encompass several of these homes, so don't even try to walk away from this, I want accountability and I want it now,” one resident said. At one point, things got so heated, a member of the refinery actually pushed a resident. 

Woods Cross residents want to know why the city or builders didn't tell them they were living in a "blast zone" when they first closed on their homes 6 years ago. If they did know it was a "blast zone," why then, did the city zone the area for residential development?

Woods Cross Mayor Kent Parry said, “The reports came back that it was safe within acceptable limits to build this residential neighborhood.”

When asked if the area was safe for people to live, Silver Eagle Refinery President Dave McSwain said, “It's been a safe area for them so far, we've never had an incident that actually went beyond our premise.”

Some residents said they want to move because they feel unsafe, but they also feel trapped. “The problem with it is that it's no longer a safe community and it drops the value of our houses, so if we had to move, we couldn't...and who's gonna compensate us for that?” one resident said. 

McSwain said they are currently in the process of working with insurance adjusters to take care of the residents whose homes were damaged.

Story Comments Share
5 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

rw0317 - 11/9/2009 11:09 PM
The refinery has been there longer then those homes. The consumer should have used common sense when looking for a home. There are many factors that you should be aware of when you are going for the best deal. My first reaction would have been why was it so cheap & what is around that could be a potential hazard. I feel that the consumer didn't do their homework & check out all of the issues. I would never have bought or looked at a home in that area where the refinery was located. You where stupid to consider a home in that area. People use your brain for something other then a hat rack!!!!!

katie888 - 11/8/2009 11:50 PM
The city council decided to issue building permits that were too close to the refinery. The developer disregarded the first engineering study that indicated that homes would not be safe if they were built that close to the refinery. Both the city and the developer are at fault.

jughhorgan - 11/5/2009 8:18 PM
there's fault on both sides--the refinery probably cuts cost in any way they can to save money and make more profit. the city should have done a better job of zoning, but of course they want to collect as much property and other taxes as possible so why wouldn't they allow more homes to be built even if they're in an unsafe area. in short; this is what happens when you live in the fraud capital of the country i.e. (read) utah rofl

Spottydog - 11/5/2009 6:04 PM
I agree. We live a couple miles from an old explosives plant, that thank goodness was shut down. We were also careful to make sure we weren't downwind from mink farms so as to avoid the smell. This is just common sense. I would NEVER put my home or family somewhere that close to something that has the potential to cause possible death and destruction. The city is wrong, but consumers probably got such a good deal they couldn't resist! Yep, that's why they have homeowners insurance....though I'm surprised companies would even insure homes there.

safetynut - 11/5/2009 12:05 PM
The city should have never aloud homes to be built so close, the people who bought the homes shouldn't have been stupid enough to buy homes in such close proximity to a refinery. My vote would be that the peoples home insurance should cover the damage.
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.