So the Judge says he won't allow comments from the journals because the don't prove voyeurism. "In his writings found in court documents, Powell admitted that he’d been “nearly out of control sexually my entire life.” He also admitted to being a “voyeur and recording women of every age …taking photos of pretty girls in short skirts, beautiful women of every age." When the defendant admits in his journal that he is, and the judge says that the defendants journal is not allowed as evidence, who is the Judge representing? Justice or the perp?

I hate this SOB. I am convinced that he either knows what happened to Susan, or was a part of it. I don't however, believe that Police should be able to get a search warrant, and be able to go on a fishing trip in someones home.