Steven Powell wins another round


Story Comments Share
Updated: 5/08/2012 9:41 pm | Published: 5/08/2012 9:34 pm
Reported by: Marcos Ortiz
Steve Powell listens as attorneys argue a series of pre-trial motions in front of Judge Ronald E. Culpepper, on the first day of his trial on voyeurism and pornography charges in the Pierce County Superior Court house, in Tacoma, Washington,  Monday, May 7, 2012.   Steve Powell is the father-in-law of missing West Valley City woman Susan Powell.  (Rick Egan, The Salt Lake Tribune)
Steve Powell listens as attorneys argue a series of pre-trial motions in front of Judge Ronald E. Culpepper, on the first day of his trial on voyeurism and pornography charges in the Pierce County Superior Court house, in Tacoma, Washington, Monday, May 7, 2012. Steve Powell is the father-in-law of missing West Valley City woman Susan Powell. (Rick Egan, The Salt Lake Tribune)

SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) –  Steve Powell won a second round of pre-trial motions when a judge ruled his diary entries would not be admissible during the trial.

Many of those writings showed Powell sexually infatuated with Susan Cox Powell who disappeared in 2009. 
Other journal entries included his obsession with young girls and pretty women.

The ruling came after a jury was seated late Tuesday.

Opening arguments will begin Wednesday morning in the trial of Steven Powell.

A fourteen member jury was selected late Tuesday to hear the voyeurism case against Powell, the father of Josh Powell.  The jury is evenly divided with seven men and seven women chosen.  Two will be considered alternates.  The jury consists
of 12 white and 2 African Americans.

The jury selection ends two days of intense questioning by both the prosecution and defense.

Meanwhile outside the ears of the prospective jurors,  a judge also ruled on key pieces of evidence the prosecution was hoping to introduce during the trial.

Primarily, several entries in a journal written by Steven Powell were at the heart of pre-trial motions..   Those journals were seized last August whenWest Valley City police along with Pierce County sheriff deputies executed a search warrant at Steven Powell’s Washington home.  It was during the search that police found evidence that led to the voyeurism charges.

The journal writings contained many sexually explicit references Powell had with Susan Cox Powell, Josh Powell’s wife who disappeared in 2009. She is presumed dead and her husband was considered a person of interest in her disappearance before he killed himself and their two sons.

In his writings found in court documents, Powell admitted that he’d been “nearly out of control sexually my entire life.”  He also admitted to being a “voyeur and recording women of every age …taking photos of pretty girls in short skirts, beautiful women of every age.

Powell also wrote that he had “been stalking Susan and had been taking secret video of her.  He writes that he “is a voyeur and she (Susan) is an exhibitionist and they are a perfect match.”

Those writings could have been damaging to Steven Powell if allowed in court but the judge refused to allow many of the references of Susan Powell to be introduced during the trial.

“They have no relevance to proving voyeurism,”  said Judge Ronald Culpepper.

He said the entries could make the jury biased against Steven Powell.

The ruling clears the way for opening arguments to begin Wednesday morning.



Story Comments Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

melinda19 - 5/9/2012 11:32 AM
0 Votes
So the Judge says he won't allow comments from the journals because the don't prove voyeurism. "In his writings found in court documents, Powell admitted that he’d been “nearly out of control sexually my entire life.” He also admitted to being a “voyeur and recording women of every age …taking photos of pretty girls in short skirts, beautiful women of every age." When the defendant admits in his journal that he is, and the judge says that the defendants journal is not allowed as evidence, who is the Judge representing? Justice or the perp?

MC Mike - 5/9/2012 7:34 AM
0 Votes
I hate this SOB. I am convinced that he either knows what happened to Susan, or was a part of it. I don't however, believe that Police should be able to get a search warrant, and be able to go on a fishing trip in someones home.
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.