Download: RSS | SMS Alerts | Podcasts | Mobile

Historic use key in dispute over Canyonlands route


Last Update: 10/09 9:36 pm
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Arches National Park (nps.gov)
Arches National Park (nps.gov)
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) - Closing arguments over the fate of a
remote route in Canyonlands National Park turned on who used it and
when - and whether that historic use is enough for a local county
to claim ownership and allow motorized vehicles to resume.

The outcome of the case could have important implications in the
West over the application of a Civil War era law that some claim
gives local authorities title to certain routes that cross federal
lands.

Friday's closing arguments in federal court capped a lengthy
trial - including a helicopter flyover of Canyonlands on Tuesday
with the judges and attorneys - pitting the federal government
against the state of Utah and San Juan County, which sued five
years ago after the National Park Service closed much of Salt Creek
Canyon to vehicles in the late 1990s.

The canyon route, once popular for commercial jeep tours, is the
primary access for a famous sandstone formation called Angel Arch.
The county and state say they should get title to the route
under a one-sentence 1866 law known as R.S. 2477 that assured
passage across federal lands.

The law, repealed in 1976 with protection for existing roads,
has led to protracted disputes about which routes crisscrossing the
West qualify for local control.

Carlie Christensen, an assistant U.S. attorney for Utah, argued
that the state and county's lawsuit is about motorized vehicles,
not public access.

"The public already has access" through the canyon by foot and
by bicycle, she said.

County officials have said keeping motorized vehicles out of
Salt Creek Canyon requires visitors to hike 10 miles each way to
see the popular arch.

During more than four hours of closing arguments, county and
state attorneys said the route was well-known and well-used by
locals in the years leading up to the creation of the national
park.

Shawn Welch, an attorney for San Juan County, said a century's
worth of human activity in the canyon clearly meets one of the key
requirements for a claim under RS 2477: 10 years of continue use.
A small part of Salt Creek Canyon was homesteaded in the late
1890s and was used periodically over the ensuing decades for
uranium exploration, cattle operations, oil and gas drilling, Boy
Scout trips and commercial jeep tours, Welch said.

He spent much of his closing argument meticulously reviewing
testimony from the case, including several people who remembered
visiting the canyon in the 1950s.

The winding route which follows Salt Creek and sometimes
features pits of quicksand, snakes through majestic canyons among
spires and archaeological sites.

Over time, Welch said, the canyon became a popular trip for
locals and visitors.

Canyonlands National Park was created in 1964. By the mid-1990s,
up to 1,000 vehicles a month were traveling along Salt Creek.
The park service in 1995 installed a gate and began limiting the
number of vehicles allowed each day. In 2004, the eight-mile
portion of the route above an area called Peekaboo Spring was
permanently put off-limits to vehicles.

Welch said the state and county are willing to accept a previous
10-vehicles-per-day limit on the road if the court rules in their
favor.

"We understand this is a special road," Welch said.
Christensen argued that the state and the county weren't able to
establish that the road was continuously used prior to the
formation of Canyonlands.

At best, she said, use of the route was occasional and sporadic.
She added that, when R.S. 2477 was enacted 143 years ago, roads
were seen as important for the settlement of the West. Part of the
reason the law was repealed in 1976 was a shift in management
policies toward more protection of natural places. The Park
Service, she said, has recognized Salt Creek as an important
natural resources that could be damaged by vehicle use.
Federal lawyers also said the county and the state were too late
in filing their claim. Bruce Bernard argued the statute of
limitations expired more than 20 years ago when decisions were
being made about the route.

It was unclear Friday when U.S. District Judge Bruce Jenkins
will make a ruling.


(Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)



ABC 4 Poll
 
Most Popular more
As Seen on ABC 4 more |
 
Blogs more |

  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.