Dana Greene - Let's face it, BYU blew it


Story Comments Share
Updated: 12/01/2010 6:06 pm | Published: 11/30/2010 1:41 pm
Reported by: Dana Greene
Now that the dust has settled from another thrilling, epic battle between BYU and Utah, it seems more apparent than ever that BYU should have won the game.

I'm not saying the Utes didn't deserve to win -- they did. They made more plays in the critical moments than the Cougars did, and that was the difference. But BYU should have never been in a situation where one play decided the game.

First of all, the BYU defense was dominant. Whether it was Jordan Wynn or Terrance Cain behind center, the Utes offense could barely move the ball across midfield through the first three quarters. That's why Bronco Mendenhall's decision to go for it on 4th and 1 in the 2nd quarter instead of kicking a field goal is so baffling. A 9-0 lead would have been huge at that point in the game. Instead, Jake Heaps' pass fell incomplete and the Utes were still within one touchdown. The play call was just as head-scratching. Why not pound the ball up the middle when you needed less than a yard? Mendenhall will no doubt regret that decision for a long time.

Then in the 4th quarter, up 13-0, BYU completely self-destructed. A botched handoff between Heaps and Josh Quezada resulted in Utah's first touchdown of the game, a spectacular catch by Devonte Christopher.

A punt that inadvertently hit B.J. Peterson helped result in the Utes second touchdown. But not before Brandon Bradley fumbled an interception that will go down with Luke Staley's "non-fumble" back in 2001 as one of the most controversial calls in rivalry history. Bradley sure appeared to have a knee down before Kendrick Moeai ripped it away. But even with that call, BYU was still in position to win.

The most baffling thing BYU did occurred at the very end of the game. With Jake Heaps moving the ball effectively downfield with 10-15 yard out patterns, offensive coordinator Robert Anae suddenly decided a 40-45 yard field goal attempt was good enough. Why not let Heaps take a couple more shots down field to set up a chip shot field goal? The Cougars still had one timeout in their pocket and the Utes defense was on its heels. Heaps was 4-for-4 on that drive and could have easily gotten 10-15 more yards.

Instead, BYU went from attack mode to conservative mode and ran the clock down to the final seconds. Mitch Payne trotted out for a 42-yard field goal, and the rest is history. Brandon Burton flew in from the corner to block the kick as time expired, preserving a 17-16 victory for the Utes.

It was a truly exciting game to watch, and Utah earned that victory with a never-say-die attitude in the 4th quarter. But there is no doubt in my mind that BYU could have and should have won had the Cougars coaches and players not fallen apart in the deciding minutes.
Story Comments Share
5 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

Thenro - 12/2/2010 7:08 AM
0 Votes
The missed 4th and 1 play was actually in the 3rd quarter and not as the article states, in the 2nd quarter. With that play being in the 3rd quarter, makes it much more imperative to extend your lead. That play call was the reason we lost the game. We kick that FG and there is no need to drive the ball down for a game winning field goal. Whether the defense is shutting out the offense or not, extending a 1 score game into a 2 score game should be an automatic. I liked the play call in that instance, but completely disagree with the rational to go for it. The fumble that was not, was a huge factor in the outcome of the game, but BYU still had their chances as the article mentions. We have nobody to blame but ourselves if you're a BYU fan. That said, any Utah fan who claims that the fumble was karma, a make-up call, etc. is in denial and more of a homer than most would like to admit.

Chem74 - 12/1/2010 5:05 PM
0 Votes
In the award winning western, "Unforgiven," Gene Hackman tells Clint Eastwood after the latter shoots the former, "I don't deserve to die like this." Clint then replies to Gene, "Deserves got nothing to do with it." Clint then shoots Gene again. The definition of "deserve" is to be worthy of or suitable for some reward. I say neither team deserved to win or lose. Armchair quarterbacking is easy - to say that BYU blew it with poor coaching decisions is a cop out. The coaches know their teams better than we do, and they are paid to and make informed decisions. Do any of us make the right decision every time? Of course not. We make decisions, good or bad, and then we live with the consequences. How many times do we regret some decision we make daily? Utah was crowning themsleves as BCS busters and national champions. But, they lost to a very good TCU team, a mediocre ND, and barely beat other mediocre teams such as Pitt, AF, SDSU and BYU. On the other hand, BYU was figuring on perhaps only 2 or 3 losses. Neither team lived up to expectations and neither deserved to win or lose the rivalry game. The game was won/lost by some crazy bounces of the ball. Neither team had any control over the bounces nor referee calls/non-calls. All that can be said is, "Utah won and has bragging rights for the next approximately 280 days." That is the here and now. All this garbage in the media - we are better than you, Wynn is better than Heaps, we won x number of the last y games, we were BCS busters, we were national champions, we are in the PAC12, we are independent, BYU blew it, etc. - is the past and irrelevant. We can't change it. It is what it is. BYU no more "blew it" than Utah "sucked it." Beating our chests and predicting how great we will be next year is the future. A lot can happen between now and then. So, let's get over it, live for today and move on.

Buzzsaw - 12/1/2010 12:05 PM
0 Votes
Some decisions by BYU coaching did not produce the desired results. The fact remains that BYU outplayed Utah on both sides of the ball. Utah gets the W, but they did not win. The biggest "mistake" was made in the replay booth on the so-called fumble. If that call had been correct, BYU may have scored on that possession and the end result could have been 23 to 10 instead of an anticipated 16 to 10. It was wrong. Period. It is also true that if Heaps had been allowed to proceed on the last drive, they may have scored then as well. The MWC conference has used and abused BYU, in my opinion, for years and with BYU, Utah and TCU gone the MWC is worse off. Boise should flee at their first opportunity.

Buzzsaw - 12/1/2010 11:55 AM
0 Votes
It is true that BYU made what in hindsight could be called mistakes since the decisions failed to produce the desired results. Without question, the biggest mistake was made in the replay booth. Where is the inquiry? Where are the rolled heads? After using and abusing BYU for several years, the MWC could care less about BYU these days since they are leaving the MWC.

Age123 - 12/1/2010 7:59 AM
0 Votes
You say that the Utes deserved to win yet their quarterbacks couldn't move the ball for 3 quarters? Get it right. A team that can only move the ball for one quarter doesn't deserve to win. All the same, BYU did blow it. No question about that. But the Utes did not deserve to win. It should have been a blowout for a top 25 team, at home, facing a "barely bowl eligible" team.
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.