Sutherland Institute responds to Robert Redford's “narrow-minded” comments


Story Comments Share
Updated: 1/18 8:35 pm | Published: 1/18 8:34 pm
Reported by: Brian Carlson
Robert Redford at Sundance Film Festival (ABC 4 News)
Robert Redford at Sundance Film Festival (ABC 4 News)
PARK CITY, Utah (ABC 4 News) – A conservative Utah group is reacting to Robert Redford’s accusations that their views on the Sundance Film Festival are “narrow-minded”.

A lot of people love the Sundance Film Festival, but not everyone feels the same way. One of those groups is the Sutherland Institute, and Thursday Redford let them have his opinion.

“Sometimes the narrowest mind barks the loudest,” said Robert Redford.

That’s what Sundance Institute founder Robert Redford said Thursday during a press conference when asked about Utah conservative group the Sutherland Institute.

“If they’d like us to go away we’ll probably take $70 to 80 million with us,” said Redford.

Sutherland said Utah should no longer financially support the festival, specifically referring to $312,000 spent in tax payer dollars.

“Why do they need $312,000 tax dollars from Utahns?” asked Paul Mero, Sutherland Institute President.

Friday ABC 4 Reporter Brian Carlson told Sutherland’s President what Redford said about them.

“How do you feel about Robert calling you narrow-minded?” asked Carlson.

“I think it’s just part of the script for Hollywood types to call anyone narrow-minded that doesn’t agree with them,” said Mero.

Redford specifically took issue with that some at Sutherland don’t approve of Sundance showing this year’s film “Lovelace” starring James Franco as Hugh Hefner, and the film “Two Mothers” where two women fall for each other’s adult sons.

“It’s a matter of choice. I would just say to these people we either ignore them or remind them that it is a free country and remind them to look at the constitution,” said Redford.

“I think I would remind Mr. Redford to read the Utah state budget,” said Mero.


-----
Follow Brian Carlson on Twitter: @tv_briancarlson
Story Comments Share
6 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of ABC4

JMichael - 1/23/2013 5:40 AM
0 Votes
That's one of the things we all love about America; free speech and the opportunity to hear an opposing view. Reading the "comments" is as enlightening as the article.

mlfurm - 1/22/2013 11:55 PM
0 Votes
Dennis - You misunderstand. That 70 - 80 million isn't money Redford is saying is profits. That is money that the state and it's communities make off of the festival. Redford is saying that if they leave it will cost the state 70-80 million in lost revenues. It's probably worth the investment for the state if that is the case. Bananarules... You're an obvious bigot calling others narrow minded... It'd be hilarious if it weren't so pathetic.

mickie4004 - 1/22/2013 10:37 PM
0 Votes
What I don't get is the complaint of Utah investing $312,000 into the festival. The state isn't just throwing money away. They are instead investing in Utah's economy and Utah's businesses. Consider that some of the wealthiest celebrities are in our state for 2 weeks, eating at our restaurants and sleeping in our hotels. That is *good* for Utah. Also, if you don't like a movie being shown, you have the option to refrain from watching the movie just as you have the option to refrain from purchasing alcohol from the State Liquor stores. I live in Utah (born and raised) and I am proud to say that the Sundance Film Festival takes place in my backyard. Thank you, Robert Redford!

Dennis - 1/19/2013 5:29 PM
1 Vote
So why doesn't Redford simply take some of that "$70 to [$]80 million" and reimburse the reported "$312,000 spent in tax payer dollars"? Would that make everyone happy or not? Especially where Redford's estimates have a plus-or-minus variance of $10 million. That seems like a perfectly logical question to me, but who ever said that logic prevails in the face of greed and petty selfishness?

bananarules - 1/19/2013 4:42 PM
1 Vote
I agree with Redford's comments. Then again, this is Utah, Land of the Mormon who are some of the most narrow minded people I've ever met in my life along with Witnesses. I'd wager those two groups are among the most narrow minded people on the planet, Earth!

xcaliboy - 1/19/2013 2:10 PM
1 Vote
I would also remind Mr Redford of the constitution. Under it, the Sutherland Inst. has the exact same right to disagree with him & voice their opinion about the content of some films Sundance shows, as he does in opposing the Inst's rights. To call them (the Inst) "narrow minded," boarders on- if not is -bigoted and very close-minded given it's context.
Are you having trouble receiving ABC 4? Before you fill out a trouble report below, try these troubleshooting steps first.
  1. Disconnect the antenna from the box or digital TV.
  2. Rescan the box or digital TV without the antenna connected. As with any scan follow the on-screen instructions or owner’s manual for your device.
  3. Unplug the box or digital TV from the electrical outlet for at least one minute.
  4. Reconnect the antenna to the box or digital TV and plug the unit into the electrical outlet.
  5. Rescan the box or digital TV one more time.
If you are still experiencing problems receiving ABC 4 or CW 30, please fill a reception problem report.

ABC 4 / CW 30 will get in touch with you to help identify the problem.
ABC 4 Poll
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.